toledo dating - Radiocarbon dating calibration curve

Modern accelerator mass spectrometry (used for radiocarbon dating purposes to separate radiocarbon atoms from stable carbon atoms and count them) is quite precise.

radiocarbon dating calibration curve-14

In Accelerator Mass Spectrometry (AMS), for example, the number of radiocarbon atoms in a stream of atoms coming from the sample is counted.

Thus there are statistical counting uncertainties proportional to the square root of the number of atoms counted.

More recently, however, the types of records available for calibration have diversified and a large group of scientists (known as the Int Cal Working Group---IWG) with a wide range of backgrounds has come together to create internationally-agreed estimates of the calibration curves.

In 2002, Caitlin Buck was recruited to the IWG and asked to offer advice on statistical methods for curve construction.

With the date 4530 ± 50 C BP, the peak of the radiocarbon date’s Gaussian distribution is close to the calibration curve between ~53 BP, so all these dates are assigned a high probability.

So although the radiocarbon date has a Gaussian distribution, the effect of this procedure is to weight parts of that distribution that are close to a plateau more heavily than parts of the distribution where the calibration curve is steep. Keenan wants the Gaussian distribution to be preserved.

Doug Keenan’s long essay about the IPCC treatment of surface temperature trends that I discussed earlier had a digression into his work on the calibration of radiocarbon dates that he published in 2012 in the open access EGU journal Nonlinear Processes in Geophysics.

This caught my attention as I have a research interest in radiocarbon dating and constructing age-depth models.

A common misconception about radiocarbon dating is that it gives a precise date---3577 B. In actual practice radiocarbon dating can only give a range of dates for a given sample---3650 to 3410 B.

C., for example---the true date lying somewhere in that range.

This shows that radiocarbon dates corresponding to plateaux in the calibration curve are inherently more likely than those that correspond to steep parts of the calibration curve.

Tags: , ,